it is cold cheaper galvanized normally than hot galvanized galvanized and painted but not Two color because labor cost Two to Three weeks to send out galvanized how thick each barmake sure digging is above ground so the foundation stay contractors may charge $100 per feet if they see how big the house and assuming rich opportunity Come Asian charge $80 per feet if big company and high cost of expense like kk overcharging agent to get Richmond mall rent expenses paid by Margar and angel ! who pay western reception and Shiley monalisa...
0 Comments
1, First Mario gatekeeping stage Reception answer LL :"No rent increase allowed" Public Contact Personnel :"please put in writing" 2, Second, upon LL know how to elevate the matter and fight for it, Julie Yarbrough will meet after first time : "Nope, I don't got your comparable" [Even hand delivered to PCP immediately after meeting] 3, HUB is federal, OHA staff excused :"I followed the federal law" 4, What bases? LL can not charge more than other units? Rents Charged for Other Units on the Premises The Request for Tenancy Approval (HUD-52517) requires owners to provide information, on the form itself, about the rent charged for other unassisted comparable units on the premises if the premises include more than 4 units. By accepting the PHA payment each month the owner certifies that the rent is not more than the rent charged for comparable unassisted units on the premises. If asked to do so, the owner must give the PHA information regarding rents charged for other units on the premises. 5, participant obligations? http://www.oakha.org/section8lh/attachments/Section%208%20Participant%20Obligations%20OHA-290101.pdf "HAVE MORE THAN ONE RESIDENCE" [THIS IS breaching] 6, language of the section 8 contract ? twelve pages pdf are heavy.... staff only said :"$20 per addition person and I can not break the LAW!"
http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/documents/huddoc?id=52641.pdf 1, Daly city rental coming soon ADDRESS: 373 Half Moon Lane CA 94015, DESCRIPTION: Two bedroom Good location with only $1,800 2, ADDRESS: 1520 McKinnon San Francisco CA 94124
DESCRIPTION: Three bedroom downstair Rental 1, YOU ARE HEREBY REQUIRED TO RELINQUISH THE PREMISE PURSUANT TO San Francisco Administrative Code Section 39.7(a)(3), which states in pertinent part: “The tenant is committing or permitting to exist a nuisance in, or is causing substantial damage to, the rental unit, or is creating a substantial interference with the comfort, safety or enjoyment of the landlord or tenants in the building...”
2, WITHIN THREE DAYS after the service upon you of this notice, you are hereby required to QUIT AND DELIVER UP THE POSSESSION OF THE PREMISES. 3,You are further notified that: the lessor does hereby elect to declare a forfeiture of the agreement under which you hold possession of the premise described above. A negative credit report reflecting on your credit record may be submitted to a credit report agency if you fail to fulfil the terms of your credit obligations. 4, This notice shall not superseded by any other notice served concurrently or subsequently, unless expressly stated therein. 5, If you remove yourself from, and deliver possession of the premises to your landlord within specific time, your landlord intend to : to commence an action in unlawful detainer against you to recover possession of the premises, to declare a forfeiture of the lease under which you hold possession of the premises; to recover damages for each day that you occupy the premises up through the day a judgement is entered against you; and to recover costs as permitted by law. 6, Pursuant to the San Francisco Rent Control Ordinance you are hereby notified that you are substantially violating the following material terms(s) of your tenancy: subletting and /or assigning. Advice regarding this notice is available from the Residential Rent Board at San Francisco Rent Board, 25 Van Ness, Suite 320, San Francisco CA 94102 Tel 415-252-4602 always remember 1, Tenants and landlords are both under the eyes of our Lord. Q Q
45. What is a "notice of nonresponsibility"? A A notice of nonresponsibility informs persons eligible to file a mechanics lien that the owner did not commission the work and will not be held liable if the non-owner who contracted for the work defaults on the payment. This notice must be recorded by the owner with the county recorder and then posted on the property in a conspicuous area. To be effective, it must be recorded and posted within 10 days of when the owner learns of the construction on the property. (Cal. Civ. Code §8442). A notice posted after 10 days is not effective. A notice posted before work begins is not effective either. (Jay Bailey Const. Co. v. Berry Hotel Corp. (1963), 221 Cal. App. 2d 135). A notice of nonresponsibility is used in situations where a person other than the owner of the property, usually a tenant, hires a construction worker to work on the property. By posting this notice, the owner is denying responsibility for the work and shifting all the responsibility to the person who hired the workers. Even if a notice of responsibility has been posted and recorded, the claimant may still record a mechanics lien; however, the lien will attach only to the lessee's (or prospective buyer's) improvement in the property and not to the entire real property. (Cal. Civ. Code § 3094; Howard S. Wright Construction Co. v. Superior Court (2003), 106 Cal. App. 4th 314). However, a notice of nonresponsibility protects an owner from a mechanics lien only when the owner is not involved in the construction process, and, therefore, is truly not responsible for the work. (Ott Hardware Company, Inc. v. E. D. Yost (1945), 69 Cal. App. 2d 593). An owner who “participates” in the renovations cannot waive his or her liability and risks being subject to a mechanics lien. Participation includes overseeing the project, having final approval on the plans, and directing the workers. The owner is also a participant when the lease agreement requires the land to be improved and the improvements go back to the owner after the lease ends. (Los Banos Gravel Co. v. Freeman (1976), 58 Cal. App. 3d 785). Paying for a portion of the work is a factor to be considered in deciding whether an owner is “participating.” But payment for some materials by itself does not necessarily prove participation. (Ott Hardware Company, Inc. v. E. D. Yost (1945), 69 Cal. App. 2d 593; Hayward Lbr. & Inv. Co. v Ford (194 4), 64 Cal. App. 2d 346). |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Categories
All
|