http://www.saccourt.ca.gov/forms/docs/cv-185.pdf
what is ex parte?
http://www.saccourt.ca.gov/forms/docs/cv-185.pdf
0 Comments
http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/subp002.pdf http://www.courts.ca.gov/documents/dv110.pdf
clerk should do all typing work
http://www.justia.com/trials-litigation/docs/caci/200/211.html 214. Admissions by Silence PROPOSED BY: PLAINTIFF GIVEN AS PROPOSED ___________________ GIVEN AS MODIFIED ___________________ GIVEN ON COURT’S OWN MOTION ___________________ REFUSED ___________________ WITHDRAWN ___________________ Trust Funds: Trust fund accounting
For every trust account a broker maintains, the broker maintains a general ledger for the overall trust account. The broker also maintains aseparate subaccount ledger for each owner of the trust funds. Further, the broker maintains a separate trust fund record with a ledger of any trust funds the broker receives which are not deposited in the trust account. All records of trust funds are retained by the broker for three years. Brokers are to reconcile the general ledger for the trust account against the separate subaccount ledgers each month when deposits or withdrawals are made. Unexplained excess funds called overages are still trust funds. Excess funds are to remain in the trust account or be placed in a separate trust account specifically for unexplained excesses, and escheat to the state if they are unclaimed after three years 1, unanswer your call can be resolved by LETTER, NEVER MAKE TENANT MAD because this is the reason for her to stop contacting you in her mind; simply have to be soft like Adrianna who called to repair refrigerator; NO OTHER CHOICE but going
2, originally one chiwawa dog but now 5 big dogs FOR WHAT? 3, SOFA outside for son ? is there anybody smoking outside illegally in Richmond City or in Oakland City ? 4, July 5 with a car outside but NOBODY answer meaning Clinton Ander's strategy ie RESTRAIN SETUP counter restrain setup ASAP STEPS: 1, PREPARE RESTRAIN APPLY FIRST IN SF 2, COPY 60 D AND 24 NOTICE and serve to court 3, next week get back court custody 4, hook up Kevin 5, hook up Ada 1, window os new now and so prompt u after u type 192.168.1.1 at URL, default need to be known: pwd is admin
2, use WPA2 because NetFlix TV may not be compatible for WEP and use the BlackBox default so client won't forget the pwd too ie a1b2c3d4e5 3, all camera individually need to change and $500 four camera type reset one by one too with scanning the 2D code; http://www.leagle.com/decision/20011350237F3d1113_11231.xml/RUCKER%20v.%20DAVIS use this site if necessary to find case Wednesday is good for settlement?? Tuesday filing entry of default Wednesday serving defendant paper is this In pari delicto (potior/melior est conditio possidentis), Latin for "in equal fault (better is the condition of the possessor)"[1] is a legal term used to indicate that two persons or entities are equally at fault, whether the malfeasance in question is a crime or tort. The phrase is most commonly used by courts when relief is being denied to both parties in a civil action because of wrongdoing by both parties. The phrase means, in essence, that since both parties are equally at fault, the court will not involve itself in resolving one side's claim over the other, and whoever possesses whatever is in dispute may continue to do so in the absence of a superior claim. The doctrine is similar to the defense of unclean hands, both of which are equitable defenses. Comparative fault and contributory negligence are not the same as in pari delicto, though all of these doctrines have similar policy rationales. The same principle can be applied when neither party is at fault if they have equal right to the disputed property, in which case the maxim of law becomes in aequali jure (melior est conditio possidentis).[2] Again the court will not involve itself in the dispute without a superior claim being brought before it. 3.2.1. AS A FIRST SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that the Complaint and each purported cause of action thereof fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action against Answering Party.
3.2.2. AS A SECOND SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that Y’S injuries, loss and/or damages, if any there were, were aggravated by Y’S FAILURE to use reasonable diligence to avoid or to mitigate the same. 3.2.3. AS A THIRD SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that Y is barred from asserting any causes of action by virtue of its consent to the alleged, acts or conditions about which it complains. 3.2.1 AS A FOURTH SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that the action is barred under the doctrine of laches. 3.2.1 AS A FIFTH SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that the action is barred under the doctrine of unclean hands. 3.2.1 AS A SIXTH SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that the action is barred under the doctrine of in peri delicto. 3.2.1 AS A SEVENTH SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that they have suffered damages by reason of Y’s conduct; and that if Answering Party are found liable for any damages to Y, Answering Party has a right of offset against Y. 3.2.1 AS A EIGHTH SEPARATE AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE to the Complaint and each and every cause of action thereof, Answering Party alleges that the action is barred under the bad faith. Y sold the business to parties other than LEE without giving first right of refusal to LEE. Y’s continuation of common goods delivery was intentionally bad faithful. Y’s conduct of non-continuation after payment of the beginning poultry food was bad faith. Checks were cashed and substitute checks were given prior to the filing of the Complaint but Y’s bad faith was present. 1, May did. forget all encourage to move up and proceed to lease. Envy that licensee can earn this and so even LL herself keep asking and SAVE.
2, Lau did. Even already rented out. 3, Bao did. Bao finally give up PM. 4, LESSON: LL need RELATION AND TRUST, PROTECTION AND KNOWLEDGE......MORE THAN IQ |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Categories
All
|